The Benefits of Ethnographic Research

The Benefits of Ethnographic look intoTo get to k right off your subject, integrity must be immersed with the subject in order to gain semiprecious in organic law regarding the customs, finale, and systems of life from an otherwise culture other than your give birth. Immersing oneself slew be a tedious project that lays ahead. But, if you argon c beful and well educated regarding the select of descriptive anthropology, then this t involve at hand should not be as tedious as one may think. descriptive anthropology is the yield of other cultures with clear and critical rules to run interaction among non-Western societies.We allow first draw off the development of ethnography in this paper to song the basis of what ethnography really is as contrary to what the written report could be. The knowledge of ethnography has had leash important changes in the formation of ethnography which will withal be a focus in this discussion in this paper so that we dope better na me and use the need of ethnography as anthropologists. There ar similarities and differences amongst the three changes which will examined to fully gather the importance of the changes. We will in like manner retread an example of a real life ethnographical study to provide the discussion with assure that the ethnographic study has clear rules and guidelines to describe other cultures. To add to our discussion, we will take an evaluation of ethnography whereby we will look at the pros and cons of using this mode of inquiry.The purpose of this paper is to re enchant the importance of eruditeness the study of ethnography to do the best room to study other cultures other than our own which includes the actor observation method. The near section will define what ethnography is, how anthropologists use ethnography, and c befully discuss why anthropologists use ethnography when study other cultures.The Study of Ethnography?We often take for granted the importance of learni ng about other cultures and tidy sums who live outside our communities, however, if in that location be efforts to learn about others, we can begin to understand the importance of similarities among gracious civilizations and societies. There is a study that studies the importance of other cultures as well as during the process we learn about ourselves. We come from a place of extravagance, where the modern world allows us Westerners to have everything at our disposal in that respectfore we must be unadventurous when we learn about other cultures especially from places with non-Western government agencys of doing things.There are however certain forms and guidelines that are used for this purpose specifically. These guidelines are real by anthropologists who use these guidelines to study other peoples cultures in non-Western nations. Anthropologists determined that the study called ethnography would be the basis for studying other cultures than their own. Ethnography is the authoritative study of other cultures by use of observation, participation- observation, and what I will cash the term, participation-observation-inclusion.Ethnography is mainly used to gather in a scientific manner the evidence to show that how and why groups of people chose to live as they do. Ethnography is more than importantly used in purposes to perform a logical and laid out script to guide all ethnographic work. Some examples were provided in our textbook by Schultz. Ethnography is essentially the form of observation, whereby the anthropologist observes the actions, rituals, and customs of a guild.Three Changes in EthnographyWe have straightaway examined and defined what ethnography is and why we use such a method of inquiry when studying other cultures that may differ vastly from our own ways. Early founding anthropologists used specifically observation to study cultures somewhat the world which laid the foundation for learning about human culture, which feed to the first change in ethnography. The first change convolute not macrocosm exclusively objective, rather they became aware of their biases. These early anthropologists knew that in that respect were forms of subjective-ness in their works produced and published therefore, partly tarnished. This first change also involved not organism able to be completely invisible. The subjects were aware of the anthropologist studying them from afar (Schultz2005).The bite change come from the first change where the subjects were study as in a higher place but the anthropologists also included participation of the subject. They were now aware of the benefits of asking questions in order to compare to the actually actions of the subjects. When we ask the participants, we are including the subjects with the look for which is more sophisticated than just learning from a distance. Anthropologists using this method of inquiry became more susceptible to more development that helped them understand the similarities and differences of other cultures among ourselves.Lastly, the third major change in ethnography was the usage of multiple sites for locations of concourse information. Many anthropologists were unaware of the multiple sites of locations that participants participated in that this information of multiple sites may have been gathered when anthropologists asked participants questions of daily living. We have reviewed the three changes in ethnography and we can conclude that there are significant changes that led to the modern day ethnography that is politic being perfected as we speak.Similarities and Differences of the Three Changes in EthnographyThere are several similarities and differences among the changes of ethnography. The similarities are they all require the study of the subjects, they all still gather evidence to support their arguments, and the last similarity is that they all search their best to study the best way possible.The differences were lightly tou ched above but to get further in discussion, we can view the differences as ways of improving. One major difference is that the first change and the second change came out of misleading society about other cultures. The ramifications occurred out-of-pocket to the discriminatory practices from the outcome of the anthropologists. Another difference is that the third change became more inclusive than the other previous two changes in ethnography. Both similarities and differences are important to outline to provide a critical overview of the topic of ethnography and its changes to improve the method of inquiry.Impacts of the Three ChangesThere were reachs of the three changes in the study of ethnography, which include having a more sound method of inquiry, more cypher detailed descriptions of the societies they studied, and there is more sensitivity towards subjects. The method of inquiry, participant observation, was improve with the three changes by ways of including participants themselves. This allows the inquiryer/anthropologists to fully engulf their selves into the society they are studying. Previous anthropologists who laid the groundwork for anthropology were Malinowski and Varandeh (Classnotes2010). They both developed ethnographical fieldwork to better study the cultures they were interested in. One major impact was the psychiatric hospital to Reflexivity. When an anthropologist is reflexive, they are more aware of their assumptions and position they are working and sumptuous on (Classnotes2010).An Example of Ethnography that should have utilized the Three ChangesThe anthropologist, denim Briggs, studied the Utkuhikhalingmiut (Utku, for brusk) in northern Canada in efforts to gather ethnographic seek (Schultz 2005). She was inducted into the community however there was a misunderstanding that prevented her from proceeding with her ethnographic study. The Utku were unable to fully communicate with the anthropologist and thus became frustrated with the anthropologists actions and misunderstandings. In short the anthropologist had a very difficult time in gathering priceless information that she ended up seeking help from a topical anaesthetic Utku who could help her with the communication process. The anthropologist needed more than just the study of ethnography Schultz suggests that there should be more work like this (2005). The Utku is a outstanding example of how the anthropologist should have utilized the three changes in ethnography, which are participant observation and multiple sites. The example of the ethnographic study above was provided in this essay to provide a detailed explanation of how ethnography can still require improvements.The use of sensitivity is critical to understand others heedless of different cultures or races. The use of sensitivity allows researchers to understand that we are human beings with feelings, responses, and thoughts that the anthropologist would act very suspicious if there we re no human cause of doing such research. For example, Briggs, the anthropologist discussed above, was not sensitive to the fact that these people of the north do speak a native language that would never have the same(p) meanings in English. So there should have been some sort of sentiency of this prior to going out and doing fieldwork in ethnographic methods of inquiry. Soon there will be educated native people performing ethnographical studies who enter into their own communities speaking their own languages that will make the ethnographic research more viable. These three changes have had a great impact on ethnography.Critical Evaluation of EthnographyWe have learned that there are three major changes in the way anthropologists conduct ethnographic research and that there must be an understanding from all areas of the research spectrum. Ethnography is the study of other cultures and there were significant changes in the way anthropologists perform observations of the other cult ures. These changes benefited mostly the society the anthropologists were studying but the anthropologists also gained a modified form of gathering information. The impacts are important to study as well as the history of the ethnographic study whereby the impacts are also ways to improve the method of inquiry of other nations from the positioning of the anthropologist who happens to be subjected to Western ways of life. The perspective of the anthropologist is now a portion in the reflexive process. Reflexive is the key to successful ethnographic research as now the research has a foundation to build on.When the anthropologist includes their view of life and how it differs from the group they are studying, the work that is produced is more truthful. Let me develop so that there is no confusion. This is what we learned in other classes that there is a method called grounded approach. The researcher goes back and forth between the researchers assumptions and the subjects evidence in order to compare and modify the results that are being put down and published. The grounded approach is a sensible way of conducting research by everlastingly checking and rechecking the data that is developed out of observation. The grounded approach verifies information as it is being recorded, as there is no other way to take obscure a cultures complex systems of living. Overall, the ethnographic study of other cultures has many points that the evaluation of the three changes only proves that the study is improving.Conclusion This paper has examined the use and benefits of utilizing the study of ethnography to better understand the world we live in and the people who live in this world. There were three major changes that occurred over the bunk of the period of the development of ethnography, which included participant observation and multiple sites for gathering data. These three changes gave ethnography the substance to continue as a valuable and trustworthy method of in quiry that all anthropologists should be aware of these three changes. For a final thought, we should ask the subjects themselves which is the best method to inquire learning about their culture.